Key Indicators of Banking Industry Health
Two key measures of the health of the banking industry have shown significant improvement and could point to continued solid profitability in the Financial sector in 2019 and beyond.
-
David EllisonPortfolio Manager
-
Ryan C. Kelley, CFAChief Investment Officer and Portfolio Manager
Key Takeaways
- Bank failures have declined and loan quality has improved over the last decade.
- Banks have achieved solid levels of profitability while maintaining conservative levels of risk.
- New regulations and lending practices mean banks are potentially in a stronger position to weather the next downturn.
Key Bank Indicators
Two metrics, the number of bank failures and the ratio of non-performing loans to total loans, were watched closely during the last recession. They are just as indicative of conditions in the industry today as they were in 2009. So, what are they telling us about the state of the banking industry in 2019?
Bank Failures Have Declined
As the U.S. economy has staged a long recovery following the deep recession in 2008/2009, the number of bank failures has declined significantly, dropping from a peak of 157 in 2010 to just eight in 2017. During 2018, not a single bank failed.
Loan Quality Has Improved
Non-performing loans (NPLs), or loans where the borrower is no longer paying interest or principal or both, have also declined precipitously over the last ten years. At the peak of the last recession, in the first quarter of 2010, NPLs for U.S. banks accounted for 5.5% of total loans. In the third quarter of 2018, NPLs accounted for just 1.0% of total loans.
These two indicators have charted the U.S. banking industry’s return to health following one of the worst cyclical downturns in its history. Both indicators are now consistent with levels seen during more “normal” periods of economic expansion, and they show an industry that has been operating at solid levels of profitability during the last four years of this economic expansion.
A Stronger Banking Industry Today
The slow but steady resumption of economic growth following the recession in 2008/2009 drove much of the recovery in the banking industry over the last decade. However, we believe a few factors in particular have helped put the industry in a stronger position than in the past, and have contributed to the banking industry’s ability to achieve rising rates of return on equity (12.4% in the third quarter of 2018 versus 7.9% in 2011), while maintaining conservative levels of risk.
1. Capital and Liquidity Requirements. Before the Financial Crisis, bank capital requirements were fairly loose. Some large financial institutions had leverage ratios of roughly 50 to 1 – in other words, they only had $1 in capital to protect against every $50 in loans. New government regulations now require the largest banks to hold up to 9.5% of their assets in cash and other liquid assets, meaning leverage ratios today are roughly 10 to 1, leaving banks in a much stronger position to weather the next downturn.
2. Credit Standards. In the residential mortgage market, the banks, working together with government agencies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have kept credit standards stable. Although low-deposit mortgage products are again available, the more high-risk variations have virtually disappeared, and the average American’s credit score is over 700, a level considered “solidly good.”
3. Mortgage Lending. Banks have kept the housing market supplied with liquidity since the Financial Crisis, but they have been careful not to increase lending too fast and risk facilitating a bubble in home prices, which might cause loan defaults to rise when it deflates. In illustration, the issuance of mortgage-related securities, an indicator of mortgage lending volume, was lower in 2018 than in all but four of the past 10 years.
4. Lower Corporate Debt. Corporations have deleveraged their balance sheets over the last decade, making it less likely that they will default on loans they do take out. For companies in the S&P 500 Index, total debt is still lower in dollar terms than it was in 2006, and as a percentage of total assets, it was just 25% at year-end 2018 compared with an average of over 37% in the seven years leading up to the Financial Crisis.
- In this article:
- Financials
- Small Cap Financial Fund
- Large Cap Financial Fund
You might also like
-
Viewpoint
Viewpoints by Hennessy with Dave Ellison
David EllisonPortfolio ManagerIn the latest episode of Viewpoints by Hennessy featuring Dave Ellison, Portfolio Manager of Hennessy’s Large Cap Financial Fund and Small Cap Financial Fund, he shares his outlook for the financial sector with insights on key holdings like Coinbase, Charles Schwab, and Visa.
-
Portfolio Perspective
Large Cap Financial FundSmall Cap Financial FundPerspective on the Financial Sector
David EllisonPortfolio ManagerRyan C. Kelley, CFAChief Investment Officer and Portfolio ManagerPortfolio Managers Dave Ellison and Ryan Kelley discuss their perspective and outlook on the banking industry, banks’ net interest margins and valuations. They also discuss the allocation of the Large Cap Financial Fund and the attributes they seek in smaller banks for the Small Cap Financial Fund.
-
Portfolio Perspective
Large Cap Financial FundSmall Cap Financial FundA Focus on Traditional Banking Models
David EllisonPortfolio ManagerRyan C. Kelley, CFAChief Investment Officer and Portfolio ManagerPortfolio Managers Dave Ellison and Ryan Kelley discuss the banking crisis that unfolded in the first quarter of 2023, deposit withdrawals and their effect on banks, valuations of Financials, and an outlook for the sector for the remainder of 2023.